Diagnosis and treatment of disorders of intracranial pressure: consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group.

Primary intracranial pressure disorders include idiopathic intracranial hypertension and spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Remarkable advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of these 2entities in recent years. Therefore, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (GECSEN) deemed it necessary to prepare this consensus statement, including diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms to facilitate and improve the management of these disorders in clinical practice. This document was created by a committee of experts belonging to GECSEN, and is based on a systematic review of the literature, incorporating the experience of the participants, and establishes practical recommendations with levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.

Aplicación de la telemedicina en la asistencia a pacientes con cefaleas: situación actual y recomendaciones del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de / NeurologíaTelemedicine in the management of patients with headache: current situation and recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group

Introducción: La pandemia COVID-19 ha provocado un inusitado impulso a la telemedicina(TM). Analizamos el impacto de la pandemia en la TM aplicada en las consultas de cefaleasespañolas, revisamos la literatura y lanzamos unas recomendaciones para implantar la TM enlas consultas. Método: Tres fases: 1) Revisión de la base Medline desde el año 1958 (primera experienciade TM); 2) Formulario Google Forms enviado a todos los neurólogos del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Espa˜nola de Neurología (GECSEN), y 3) Consenso on-line de expertosGECSEN para emitir recomendaciones para implantar la TM en España. Resultados: La pandemia por COVID-19 ha empeorado los tiempos de espera presenciales,incrementando el uso de todas las modalidades de TM antes y después de abril de 2020: teléfonofijo (del 75% al 97%), teléfono móvil (del 9% al 27%), correo electrónico (del 30% al 36%) yvideoconsulta (del 3% al 21%). Los neurólogos son conscientes de la necesidad de ampliar laoferta con videoconsultas, claramente in crescendo, y otras herramientas de e-health y m-health. Conclusiones: Desde el GECSEN recomendamos y animamos a todos los neurólogos que asis-ten a pacientes con cefaleas a implantar recursos de TM, teniendo como objetivo óptimo lavideoconsulta en menores de 60-65 a˜nos y la llamada telefónica en mayores, si bien cada casodebe individualizarse. Se deberá contar previamente con la aprobación y asesoramiento de losservicios jurídicos e informáticos y de la dirección del centro. La mayoría de los pacientes concefalea y/o neuralgia estable son candidatos a seguimiento mediante TM, tras una primeravisita que tiene que ser siempre presencial.(AU)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unexpected boost to telemedicine. Weanalyse the impact of the pandemic on telemedicine applied in Spanish headache consultations,review the literature, and issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine inconsultations. Method: The study comprised 3 phases: 1) review of the MEDLINE database since 1958 (firstreported experience with telemedicine); 2) Google Forms survey sent to all members of theSpanish Society of Neurology’s Headache Study Group (GECSEN); and 3) online consensus ofGECSEN experts to issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in Spain.Results: COVID-19 has increased waiting times for face-to-face consultations, increasing theuse of all telemedicine modalities: landline telephone (from 75% before April 2020 to 97% after),mobile telephone (from 9% to 27%), e-mail (from 30% to 36%), and video consultation (from 3%to 21%). Neurologists are aware of the need to expand the availability of video consultations,which are clearly growing, and other e-health and m-health tools. Conclusions: The GECSEN recommends and encourages all neurologists who assist patients withheadaches to implement telemedicine resources, with the optimal objective of offering videoconsultation to patients under 60-65 years of age and telephone calls to older patients, althougheach case must be considered on an individual basis. Prior approval and advice must be soughtfrom legal and IT services and the centre’s management. Most patients with stable headacheand/or neuralgia are eligible for telemedicine follow-up, after a first consultation that mustalways be held in person.(AU)

Cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico. Actualización semiológica y diagnóstica / Headache attributed to ischaemic stroke. An update on its semiology and diagnosis

Introducción: La cefalea es un síntoma frecuente tras el ictus isquémico agudo. Su identificación y diagnóstico constituyen un reto por el perfil de paciente y los criterios diagnósticos actuales de esta entidad. Los objetivos del estudio fueron determinar la prevalencia de cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico y su forma persistente, y analizar las variables clinicodemográficas y el grado de cumplimiento de los criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas (ICHD-III). Pacientes y métodos: Es un estudio observacional analítico de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes ingresados con ictus isquémico agudo en la unidad de ictus de un hospital de tercer nivel en un período de 12 meses. Resultados: Se incluyó a 244 pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo (el 59,8%, varones; edad media: 71 ± 12,8 años). El 23,2% presentó cefalea en el momento del ingreso o bien en las primeras 72 horas y el 12,5% de ellos presentó cefalea persistente atribuida a ictus isquémico. El 62,5% cumplió los criterios diagnósticos de acuerdo con la ICHD-III. Conclusión: La cefalea tras el ictus isquémico es un síntoma frecuente. Su aparición se asoció al sexo femenino, al ictus de territorio vertebrobasilar y a puntuaciones bajas en la National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Sería recomendable revisar los criterios diagnósticos actuales.(AU)

Introduction: Headache is a common symptom in acute ischemic stroke which is often overlooked and undertreated because of focus in neurologic function, communication difficulties in stroke patients and the current diagnostic criteria of this type of headache. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of Acute and Persistent Headache Attributed to Ischemic Stroke and to analyze the fulfillment of the criteria of the International Classification of Headaches (ICHD-IID). Patients and methods: Prospective observational analytical cohort study. The study population consisted of patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Stroke Unit of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 12 months. Results: Two hundred and forty-four patients with acute ischemic stroke (59.8% males, mean age 71+12.8 years) were included. Headache at onset or at the first 72 hours was present in 23.2% and 12.5% of them presented persistent headache attributed to ischemic stroke. Only 62.5% of the headaches at stroke onset fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of ICHD-III. Conclusion: Headache after ischemic stroke is a common symptom. It was associated with female sex, posterior circulation stroke and low scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The current diagnostic criteria should be reviewed.

Telemedicine in the management of patients with headache: current situation and recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unexpected boost to telemedicine. We analyse the impact of the pandemic on telemedicine applied in Spanish headache consultations, review the literature, and issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in consultations. METHOD: The study comprised 3 phases: 1) review of the MEDLINE database since 1958 (first reported experience with telemedicine); 2) Google Forms survey sent to all members of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (GECSEN); and 3) online consensus of GECSEN experts to issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in Spain. RESULTS: COVID-19 has increased waiting times for face-to-face consultations, increasing the use of all telemedicine modalities: landline telephone (from 75% before April 2020 to 97% after), mobile telephone (from 9% to 27%), e-mail (from 30% to 36%), and video consultation (from 3% to 21%). Neurologists are aware of the need to expand the availability of video consultations, which are clearly growing, and other e-health and m-health tools. CONCLUSIONS: The GECSEN recommends and encourages all neurologists who assist patients with headaches to implement telemedicine resources, with the optimal objective of offering video consultation to patients under 60-65 years of age and telephone calls to older patients, although each case must be considered on an individual basis. Prior approval and advice must be sought from legal and IT services and the centre's management. Most patients with stable headache and/or neuralgia are eligible for telemedicine follow-up, after a first consultation that must always be held in person.

Estudio del déficit de habituación en pacientes con migraña episódica mediante reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo / Habituation deficit study in patients with episodic migraine thru nociceptive blink reflex

Introducción. La falta de habituación es el fenómeno neurofisiológico interictal más reproducible en la migraña episódica. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el fenómeno de habituación mediante el estudio del reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo en pacientes con migraña episódica. Sujetos y métodosEstudio observacional transversal de casos y controles. Los pacientes con migraña episódica fueron seleccionados de manera consecutiva, estudiados durante la fase interictal. Se estudió el reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo, y se realizó un estudio comparativo de simetría, análisis de distancias euclidianas y valoración de prolongación de latencias entre bloques de estimulación. Resultados Se incluyó a 31 pacientes y 16 controles sanos, con una edad media de 32,25 y 32,35 años, respectivamente. Los controles mostraron simetría izquierda-derecha. Las distancias euclidiana y Manhattan demostraron que las medias de las latencias por bloque de los grupos son diferentes y se incrementan según el número de bloques que se comparen. Las medias de las latencias de los bloques no difieren significativamente en el grupo de pacientes con migraña, a diferencia del grupo de sanos. Conclusión Se observó un déficit de habituación en la fase intercrítica en pacientes con migraña episódica frente a controles, medido por la ausencia de prolongación de latencias en el reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo. (AU)

Introduction. Lack of habituation is the most reproducible interictal neurophysiological phenomenon in episodic migraine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the habituation phenomenon by examining the nociceptive blink reflex in patients with episodic migraine. Subjects and methods. We conducted a cross-sectional observational case-control study. Patients with episodic migraine were selected consecutively and studied during the interictal phase. The nociceptive blink reflex was examined and a study was conducted comparing symmetry, analysis of the Euclidean distances and assessment of latency prolongation between stimulation blocks. Results. Thirty-one patients and 16 healthy controls were included, their mean ages being 32.25 and 32.35 years, respectively. The controls displayed left-right symmetry. The Euclidean and Manhattan distances showed that the means of the block latencies of the groups are different and increase according to the number of blocks being compared. The means of the block latencies do not differ significantly in the migraine patient group, in contrast to what is seen in the healthy group. Conclusion. Habituation deficit was observed in the interictal phase in patients with episodic migraine compared to controls, as measured by the absence of latency prolongation in the nociceptive blink reflex. (AU)

[Headache attributed to ischaemic stroke. An update on its semiology and diagnosis]. / Cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico. Actualización semiológica y diagnóstica.

INTRODUCTION: Headache is a common symptom in acute ischemic stroke which is often overlooked and undertreated because of focus in neurologic function, communication difficulties in stroke patients and the current diagnostic criteria of this type of headache. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of Acute and Persistent Headache Attributed to Ischemic Stroke and to analyze the fulfillment of the criteria of the International Classification of Headaches (ICHD-IID). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational analytical cohort study. The study population consisted of patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Stroke Unit of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-four patients with acute ischemic stroke (59.8% males, mean age 71+12.8 years) were included. Headache at onset or at the first 72 hours was present in 23.2% and 12.5% of them presented persistent headache attributed to ischemic stroke. Only 62.5% of the headaches at stroke onset fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of ICHD-III. CONCLUSION: Headache after ischemic stroke is a common symptom. It was associated with female sex, posterior circulation stroke and low scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The current diagnostic criteria should be reviewed.

TITLE: Cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico. Actualización semiológica y diagnóstica.Introducción. La cefalea es un síntoma frecuente tras el ictus isquémico agudo. Su identificación y diagnóstico constituyen un reto por el perfil de paciente y los criterios diagnósticos actuales de esta entidad. Los objetivos del estudio fueron determinar la prevalencia de cefalea atribuida a ictus isquémico y su forma persistente, y analizar las variables clinicodemográficas y el grado de cumplimiento de los criterios de la Clasificación Internacional de Cefaleas (ICHD-III). Pacientes y métodos. Es un estudio observacional analítico de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes ingresados con ictus isquémico agudo en la unidad de ictus de un hospital de tercer nivel en un período de 12 meses. Resultados. Se incluyó a 244 pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo (el 59,8%, varones; edad media: 71 ± 12,8 años). El 23,2% presentó cefalea en el momento del ingreso o bien en las primeras 72 horas y el 12,5% de ellos presentó cefalea persistente atribuida a ictus isquémico. El 62,5% cumplió los criterios diagnósticos de acuerdo con la ICHD-III. Conclusión. La cefalea tras el ictus isquémico es un síntoma frecuente. Su aparición se asoció al sexo femenino, al ictus de territorio vertebrobasilar y a puntuaciones bajas en la National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Sería recomendable revisar los criterios diagnósticos actuales.

[Habituation deficit study in patients with episodic migraine thru nociceptive blink reflex]. / Estudio del déficit de habituación en pacientes con migraña episódica mediante reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of habituation is the most reproducible interictal neurophysiological phenomenon in episodic migraine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the habituation phenomenon by examining the nociceptive blink reflex in patients with episodic migraine. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational case-control study. Patients with episodic migraine were selected consecutively and studied during the interictal phase. The nociceptive blink reflex was examined and a study was conducted comparing symmetry, analysis of the Euclidean distances and assessment of latency prolongation between stimulation blocks. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients and 16 healthy controls were included, their mean ages being 32.25 and 32.35 years, respectively. The controls displayed left-right symmetry. The Euclidean and Manhattan distances showed that the means of the block latencies of the groups are different and increase according to the number of blocks being compared. The means of the block latencies do not differ significantly in the migraine patient group, in contrast to what is seen in the healthy group. CONCLUSION: Habituation deficit was observed in the interictal phase in patients with episodic migraine compared to controls, as measured by the absence of latency prolongation in the nociceptive blink reflex.

TITLE: Estudio del déficit de habituación en pacientes con migraña episódica mediante reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo.Introducción. La falta de habituación es el fenómeno neurofisiológico interictal más reproducible en la migraña episódica. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el fenómeno de habituación mediante el estudio del reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo en pacientes con migraña episódica. Sujetos y métodos. Estudio observacional transversal de casos y controles. Los pacientes con migraña episódica fueron seleccionados de manera consecutiva, estudiados durante la fase interictal. Se estudió el reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo, y se realizó un estudio comparativo de simetría, análisis de distancias euclidianas y valoración de prolongación de latencias entre bloques de estimulación. Resultados. Se incluyó a 31 pacientes y 16 controles sanos, con una edad media de 32,25 y 32,35 años, respectivamente. Los controles mostraron simetría izquierda-derecha. Las distancias euclidiana y Manhattan demostraron que las medias de las latencias por bloque de los grupos son diferentes y se incrementan según el número de bloques que se comparen. Las medias de las latencias de los bloques no difieren significativamente en el grupo de pacientes con migraña, a diferencia del grupo de sanos. Conclusión. Se observó un déficit de habituación en la fase intercrítica en pacientes con migraña episódica frente a controles, medido por la ausencia de prolongación de latencias en el reflejo de parpadeo nociceptivo.

Evaluation of the burden of migraine on the partner's lifestyle.

BACKGROUND: Despite the number of research studies regarding the individual burden of migraine, few studies have examined its impact on the patients' partners. We aim to assess migraine effects on the patients' partners on sentimental relationship, children relationship, friendship, and work, as well as the caregiver burden, anxiety and/or depression. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted through an online survey of partners of patients with migraine followed-up in 5 Headache Units. Questions about the 4 areas of interest and 2 scales (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Zarit scale) were included. Scores were compared against the population prevalence. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five answers were analysed. Among the patient's partners 135/155 (87.1%) were men, with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. Migraine's main effects on partners were observed in the sentimental relationship and items concerning children and friendships, with a minor impact at work. Partners showed a moderate burden (12/155 = 7.7% [4.1%-13.1%]), and a higher moderate-severe anxiety rate (23/155 = 14.8% [9.6%-21.4%]), and similar depression rate (5/155 = 3.2% [1.1%-7.3%]) compared to the National Health Survey. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of migraine impacts the partners' personal relationship, childcare, friendship and work. Moreover, certain migraine partners showed a moderate burden according to Zarit scale and higher anxiety levels than the Spanish population.

Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine symptoms vary significantly between patients and within the same patient. Currently, an increasing number of therapeutic options are available for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Guidelines encourage physicians to use shared decision-making (SDM) in their practice, listening to patients' treatment preferences in order to select the most suitable and effective therapy. Although training for healthcare professionals could increase their awareness of SDM, results concerning its effectiveness are inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the impact of a training activity to promote SDM in the context of migraine care. This was addressed by evaluating the impact on patients' decisional conflict (main objective), patient-physician relationship, neurologists' perceptions of the training and patient's perception of SDM. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was conducted in four highly specialized headache units. The participating neurologists received SDM training targeting people with migraine in clinical practice to provide techniques and tools to optimize physician-patient interactions and encourage patient involvement in SDM. The study was set up in three consecutive phases: control phase, in which neurologists were blind to the training activity and performed the consultation with the control group under routine clinical practice; training phase, when the same neurologists participated in the SDM training; and SDM phase, in which these neurologists performed the consultation with the intervention group after the training. Patients in both groups with a change of treatment assessment during the visit completed the Decisional conflict scale (DCS) after the consultation to measure the patient's decisional conflict. Also, patients answered the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (CREM-P) and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The mean ± SD scores obtained from the study questionnaires were calculated for both groups and compared to determine whether there were significant differences (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 180 migraine patients (86.7% female, mean age of 38.5 ± 12.3 years) were included, of which 128 required a migraine treatment change assessment during the consultation (control group, n = 68; intervention group, n = 60). A low decisional conflict was found without significant differences between the intervention (25.6 ± 23.4) and control group (22.1 ± 17.9; p = 0.5597). No significant differences in the CREM-P and SDM-Q-9 scores were observed between groups. Physicians were satisfied with the training and showed greater agreement with the clarity, quality and selection of the contents. Moreover, physicians felt confident communicating with patients after the training, and they applied the techniques and SDM strategies learned. CONCLUSION: SDM is a model currently being actively used in clinical practice for headache consultation, with high patient involvement in the process. This SDM training, while useful from the physician's perspective, may be more effective at other levels of care where there is still room for optimization of patient involvement in decision-making.

Diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: Consensus statement from the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic neuropathic pain disorder affecting one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Despite its relatively low global prevalence, TN is an important healthcare problem both in neurology departments and in emergency departments due to the difficulty of diagnosing and treating the condition and its significant impact on patients' quality of life. For all these reasons, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group has developed a consensus statement on the management of TN. DEVELOPMENT: This document was drafted by a panel of neurologists specialising in headache, who used the terminology of the International Headache Society. We analysed the published scientific evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of TN and establish practical recommendations with levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of TN is based on clinical criteria. Pain attributed to a lesion or disease of the trigeminal nerve is divided into TN and painful trigeminal neuropathy, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition. TN is further subclassified into classical, secondary, or idiopathic, according to aetiology. Brain MRI is recommended in patients with clinical diagnosis of TN, in order to rule out secondary causes. In MRI studies to detect neurovascular compression, FIESTA, DRIVE, or CISS sequences are recommended. Pharmacological treatment is the initial choice in all patients. In selected cases with drug-resistant pain or poor tolerance, surgery should be considered.

Prevalence of neurological complications in infective endocarditis.

INTRODUCTION: Neurological complications are the most frequent type of extracardiac complications of infective endocarditis (IE), and can be the initial manifestation. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of neurological complications in patients with IE and to evaluate whether initial presentation with neurological symptoms causes a diagnostic delay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with IE admitted to a tertiary hospital between 2003 and 2020. RESULTS: The study included 222 patients with IE (67% men; mean [SD] age, 66.4 [14.2] years). Neurological complications occurred in 21.2% of patients, with ischaemic stroke (74.5%) and intracerebral haemorrhage (23.4%) being the most frequent. No differences in diagnostic delay were found between the group of patients in whom the disease manifested with neurological complications and the rest of the patients (4.4 vs 4.5; P = .76). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 21.2% of patients with IE presented neurological complications, with ischaemic stroke being the most frequent. Neurological symptoms as the initial manifestation of IE did not lead to a delay in diagnosis.

Headache: what to ask, how to examine, and what scales to use. Recommendations of the Spanish society of neurology's headache study group.

INTRODUCCIóN: La cefalea es el motivo de consulta neurológico más prevalente en los distintos niveles asistenciales, donde la anamnesis y exploración son primordiales para realizar un diagnóstico y tratamiento adecuados. Con la intención de unificar la atención de esta patología, el Grupo de Estudio de Cefalea de la Sociedad Española de Neurología (GECSEN) ha decidido elaborar unas recomendaciones consensuadas para mejorar y garantizar una adecuada asistencia en Atención Primaria, Urgencias y Neurología. METODOLOGíA: El documento es práctico, sigue el orden de la dinámica de actuación durante una consulta: anamnesis, escalas que cuantifican el impacto y la discapacidad y exploración. Además, finaliza con pautas para realizar un seguimiento adecuado y un manejo de las expectativas del paciente con el tratamiento pautado. CONCLUSIONES: Esperamos ofrecer una herramienta que mejore la atención al paciente con cefalea para garantizar una asistencia adecuada y homogénea a nivel nacional.

¿Qué preguntar, cómo explorar y qué escalas usar en el paciente con cefalea? Recomendaciones del Grupo de Estudio de Cefalea de la Sociedad Española de Neurología / Headache: What to ask, how to examine, and which scales to use. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group

Introducción: La cefalea es el motivo de consulta neurológico más prevalente en los distintos niveles asistenciales, donde la anamnesis y exploración son primordiales para realizar un diagnóstico y tratamiento adecuados. Con la intención de unificar la atención de esta patología, el Grupo de Estudio de Cefalea de la Sociedad Española de Neurología (GECSEN) ha decidido elaborar unas recomendaciones consensuadas para mejorar y garantizar una adecuada asistencia en atención primaria, urgencias y neurología. Metodología: El documento es práctico, sigue el orden de la dinámica de actuación durante una consulta: anamnesis, escalas que cuantifican el impacto y la discapacidad y exploración. Además, finaliza con pautas para realizar un seguimiento adecuado y un manejo de las expectativas del paciente con el tratamiento pautado. Conclusiones: Esperamos ofrecer una herramienta que mejore la atención al paciente con cefalea para garantizar una asistencia adecuada y homogénea a nivel nacional. (AU)

Introduction: Headache is the most common neurological complaint at the different levels of the healthcare system, and clinical history and physical examination are essential in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. With the objective of unifying the care given to patients with headache, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (GECSEN) has decided to establish a series of consensus recommendations to improve and guarantee adequate care in primary care, emergency services, and neurology departments. Methods: With the aim of creating a practical document, the recommendations follow the dynamics of a medical consultation: clinical history, physical examination, and scales quantifying headache impact and disability. In addition, we provide recommendations for follow-up and managing patients’ expectations of the treatment. Conclusions: With this tool, we aim to improve the care given to patients with headache in order to guarantee adequate, homogeneous care across Spain. (AU)

Calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment.

INTRODUCTION: It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. DEVELOPMENT: The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.

CGRP en migraña: de la fisiopatología a la terapéutica / Calcitonin gene–related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment

Introducción: En los últimos años se ha observado que moléculas como el péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina (CGRP) y, en menor grado, el péptido activador de la adenilato-ciclasa pituitaria estaban elevadas durante los ataques de migraña y en la migraña crónica tanto en líquido cefalorraquídeo como en suero y que su reducción farmacológica tenía una significación clínica con una mejoría en la migraña de los pacientes. Es lógico por tanto que una de las principales líneas de investigación en migraña se base en el papel del CGRP en la fisiopatología de esta entidad. Desarrollo: Desde el Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología nos planteamos la redacción de este documento, cuyo objetivo es abordar, basándonos en la evidencia publicada, cuestiones tan importantes como el papel del CGRP en la fisiopatología de la migraña, el mecanismo de acción de los anticuerpos monoclonales y de los gepantes, el análisis crítico de los resultados de los diferentes estudios, el perfil del paciente que podría ser candidato al tratamiento con anticuerpos monoclonales y su impacto en términos de farmacoeconomía. Conclusiones: El desarrollo clínico de los gepantes, antagonistas del CGRP, para el tratamiento agudo del ataque de migraña y de los anticuerpos monoclonales contra ligando y contra el receptor del CGRP ofrecen resultados esperanzadores para nuestros pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients’ migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. Development: The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. Conclusions: The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients. (AU)

Epilepsy in elderly patients: does age of onset make a difference?

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is most frequent in children and elderly people. Today's population is ageing and epilepsy prevalence is increasing. The type of epilepsy and its management change with age. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study comparing patients aged ≥ 65 years with epilepsy diagnosed before and after the age of 65, and describing epilepsy characteristics and comorbidities in each group. RESULTS: The sample included 123 patients, of whom 61 were diagnosed at < 65 years of age (group A), 62 at ≥ 65 of age (group B). Sex distribution was similar in both groups, with 39 men (62.9%) in group A and 37 (60.7%) in group B. Mean age was 69.97 ±â€¯5.6 years in group A and 77.29 ±â€¯6.73 in group B. The most common aetiology was cryptogenic in group A (44.3%, n = 27) and vascular in group B (74.2%, n = 46). History of stroke was present in 12 patients from group A (19.7%) and 32 (51.6%) in group B. Antiepileptic drugs were prescribed at lower doses in group A. Statistically significant differences were found between groups for history of ischaemic stroke, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, and diabetes mellitus; degree of dependence; and number of antiepileptic drugs. CONCLUSION: Age of onset ≥ 65 years is closely related to cardiovascular risk factors; these patients require fewer antiepileptic drugs and respond to lower doses. Some cases initially present as status epilepticus.

Cefalea: embarazo y lactancia. Recomendaciones del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología (GECSEN) / Headache: pregnancy and breastfeeding Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group

Introducción: La cefalea es uno de los motivos de consulta más comunes en neurología, siendo más frecuente durante la edad reproductiva. Por ello, es habitual encontrar en nuestras consultas pacientes embarazadas o en periodo de lactancia con dicha queja. Es importante conocer las opciones farmacológicas más seguras, cuáles no se deben emplear, así como cuándo sospechar cefaleas secundarias. Por este motivo, el Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología ha elaborado una guía con las recomendaciones consensuadas acerca de los algoritmos diagnósticos y terapéuticos que se deben emplear durante el embarazo y la lactancia. Desarrollo: Esta guía ha sido redactada por un grupo de jóvenes neurólogos con especial interés y experiencia en cefaleas en colaboración con la Junta Directiva del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología. Las recomendaciones se centran en los fármacos aconsejados en las cefaleas primarias más frecuentes, tanto en su fase aguda como preventiva. En una segunda parte se aborda cuándo sospechar y qué pruebas realizar ante una posible cefalea secundaria durante el embarazo y la lactancia. Conclusiones: Esperamos que esta guía resulte de utilidad y permita su aplicación práctica en la consulta diaria. Asimismo, que sirva para actualizar y mejorar el conocimiento del manejo de las cefaleas durante estas etapas, para actuar con mayor confianza ante estas pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: Headache is one of the most common neurological complaints, and is most frequent during reproductive age. As a result, we are routinely faced with pregnant or breastfeeding women with this symptom in clinical practice. It is important to know which pharmacological choices are the safest, which should not be used, and when we should suspect secondary headache. To this end, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Grouphas prepared a series of consensus recommendations on the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms that should be followed during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Development: This guide was prepared by a group of young neurologists with special interest and experience in headache, in collaboration with the Group's Executive Committee. Recommendations focus on which drugs should be used for the most frequent primary headaches, both during the acute phase and for prevention. The second part addresses when secondary headache should be suspected and which diagnostic tests should be performed in the event of possible secondary headache during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Conclusions: We hope this guide will be practical and useful in daily clinical practice and that it will help update and improve understanding of headache management during pregnancy and breastfeeding, enabling physicians to more confidently treat these patients. (AU)

Headache: pregnancy and breastfeeding. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: Headache is one of the most common neurological complaints, and is most frequent during reproductive age. As a result, we are routinely faced with pregnant or breastfeeding women with this symptom in clinical practice. It is important to know which pharmacological choices are the safest, which should not be used, and when we should suspect secondary headache. To this end, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group has prepared a series of consensus recommendations on the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms that should be followed during pregnancy and breastfeeding. DEVELOPMENT: This guide was prepared by a group of young neurologists with special interest and experience in headache, in collaboration with the Group's Executive Committee. Recommendations focus on which drugs should be used for the most frequent primary headaches, both during the acute phase and for prevention. The second part addresses when secondary headache should be suspected and which diagnostic tests should be performed in the event of possible secondary headache during pregnancy and breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: We hope this guide will be practical and useful in daily clinical practice and that it will help update and improve understanding of headache management during pregnancy and breastfeeding, enabling physicians to more confidently treat these patients.